Why is there any doubt about where blame lies for the Grenfell Tower fire?
Until retirement, I was an offshore design engineer designing mechanical systems for oil/gas rigs and wind farm converter platforms all over the world.
There was not one component that was not individually fire-tested, certified and, if part of a composite structure, tested along with the intended components to be part of the composite.
OTHER NEWS:
- Councils respond after billboard claims they have made Newtown as 'ghost town'
- Powys farm famous for being red kite feeding spot insists it is not closing
- Powys motorist caused crash after driving on the wrong side of road
This was rigorously applied to cladding composites both internal and external.
No offshore structure can be tolerated that does not have a registered certification dossier proving compliance with the many standards applicable – particularly those elements.
Such dossiers would have to be approved by Certification Bodies such as Lloyds, DnV etc. Without this, an offshore structure cannot be insured.
What compliance checks did the insurers of Grenfell Tower make?
You surely cannot blame suppliers for poor materials as they would/could only provide what was specified.
I have to add that in 40 years of practice I did work on one or two land-based jobs (when offshore work became scarce) and I was surprised at the stark difference in safety standards.
Peter Williams
Caersws
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel