A Powys councillor who tabled a motion to encourage people to eat more red meat has said his fellow members should 'hang their heads in shame' after it was kicked into touch.

Cllr Iain McIntosh introduced the motion - which had a wide range of aspects to it - saying he felt the council needed to engage better with farming groups.

But after a discussion, councillors took the decision to bypass the motion without a vote, leading Cllr McIntosh to say afterwards: “They should all hang their heads in shame.”

The motion had asked councillors to back:

  • Working in partnership with all forms of agriculture in Powys.
  • To continually champion the produce of Powys farmers.
  • To highlight, and promote where possible, access to new and additional on-farm funding, assisting farmers in diversification and in meeting environmental targets.
  • To encourage residents to shop locally where possible supporting the local economy through conscious consumer choices.
  • Actively promoting red meat as part of a healthy diet for all residents, thereby assisting livestock farmers and ensuring the health of our community.
  • To promote agriculture as a desirable and sustainable career for young people.
  • To encourage Young Farmer Clubs in their mission to educate and train young people in modern, sustainable farming methods.
  • To encourage Young Farmer Clubs to take part in future consultation processes affecting farmers and agriculture.

Liberal Democrat Cabinet member for a connected Powys, Cllr Jake Berriman said: “I’m a huge supporter of British, Welsh, Powys and Radnorshire farming.

“I am really unclear on the value of this motion, there is no clarity on who should do what when and how much each individual proposal will cost.

“I fail to see what we’re not doing that this specifically calls for us to do.”

He said he was “more than happy” to bring forward a detailed paper to show what the council is doing to support the agricultural sector.

Plaid Cymru group leader, Cllr Elwyn Vaughan said: “I find this very odd.

“While we may have an interesting and passionate discussion, in reality it won’t make one iota of difference to the agricultural and rural communities of Powys.”

(Image: NQ)

He asked Cllr McIntosh to withdraw the motion especially as the seconder, fellow Conservative Cllr Les George, was not in the meeting at the time.

Green party’s Cllr Jeremy Brignell-Thorp said: “If you look at the NHS website it states that eating too much processed and red meat increases your risk of bowel cancer.

“I don’t feel I can support a motion that appears to be recommending something the NHS warns against.”

As the debate wore on cabinet member for a safer Powys Cllr Richard Church proposed a “procedural motion ” under the constitution to move the meeting on to “next business.”

This would bypass the need to vote on the motion.

This was seconded by cabinet member for a greener Powys, Liberal Democrat Cllr Jackie Charlton.

Conservative Cllr Lucy Roberts said: “The only argument for not voting for the motion is a purely political one, I’m very disappointed we’re all not working together in the best interest of Powys farmers.”

Summing up at the end of the debate Cllr McIntosh said:  “Since being elected in 2017 I’ve met and spoken with farmers, others involved with agriculture and YFC’s (Young Farmers Clubs) and they have all said the council needs to improve the way it engages and supports them.

OTHER NEWS:

“When putting this motion forward I was involved in discussions with council officers who agreed that there was more that needed to be done, and it was a good reason for putting this forward.”

Before going to a vote director of corporate services Jane Thomas wanted to explain that council officers don’t provide an opinion on motions by councillors.

Ms Thomas said: “For clarity, officers look at the motion, give a financial assessment and discuss it with councillors, but don’t agree it in terms of providing a recommendation.”

The proposal to move to next business was put to the council and 31 councillors voted in favour, 12 against and there were two abstentions.